公告


各位兄弟姐妹, 欢迎大家来做客!本博客欢迎大家积极参与讨论问题! 但请大家注意:本博客不接受任何过激言论,如果出现都将被删除! 程晓华 程晓华制造业库存控制技术研究室 http://www.kucunkz.com 程晓华个人博客 http://www.chinaiscm.cn 中国集成供应链管理与库存控制论坛 http://www.china56scm.com 邮箱 / msn: johnchengbj@live.cn 个人专著《制造业库存控制技巧》2007年11月中国物资出版社出版

关于我

<2009年6月>
31123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
2829301234
567891011

最近来访

留言簿(12)

随笔分类

随笔档案

文章分类

文章档案

相册

程晓华制造业库存控制技术研究室

个人网站


最新评论

1. re: 案例讨论:物料计划员为什么“无端地”被处罚?
1.首先作为物料计划员的L小姐,在物料短缺的时候应该留守第一线协助解决问题,统计未来物料供应状况,而不是离开。由于程序的问题造成计划用量与实际用量不符,这个问题应该存在一定时间,而L小姐并没有及时发现,这是她的失职,应作出一定处罚。--【匿名用户】:E-works热心网友
2. re: 8岁女孩儿遗言催人泪下:我来过,我很乖
我喉咙哽咽了,我流泪了,她为什么被抛弃?在第一时间为什么没有得到政府的重视?她一定还有一个没有说出的梦想:想知道亲身父母是谁?我想起了这个国家,我想起了这个国家的治理者,我想起了这个国家的社会保障制度,我想起了在这个有5000年文明的古国每天还在上演同样类似的故事,我想起了还有多少孩子一出生同样被放弃,我想起那前仆后继的无数的贪官,我害怕这个国家未来还是这个样子。。。。。。--饼干
3. re: 物料管理之难 – 干好了是应该的
真的是左右为难!但好象永远都是这种协调,妥协,委屈与偶尔骄傲之五味杂陈。--饼干
4. re: 物料管理之难 – 干好了是应该的
晓华所言极是,已经入世的境界了,呵呵--【匿名用户】:E-works热心网友
5. re: 案例讨论:物料计划员为什么“无端地”被处罚?
类似于阻容件类的低值品,&nbsp;而且是公司所有产品的通用料,&nbsp;如果不是供应商处有特殊原因,&nbsp;那么在物料计划时早应备有相当余量,&nbsp;绝不应该卡到生产刚够或略有余量--【匿名用户】:E-works热心网友
6. re: 库存优化与成本控制 - 程晓华演讲稿
程先生,

我是Abby。感谢您的精彩演讲。希望以后多多合作!

Merry&nbsp;Christmas!--【匿名用户】:Abby
7. re: lean itself is a kind of waste - LEAN 本身就是浪费?
嘿嘿,我想大家还都没能理解LEAN的真正核心!

LEAN讲究的是一种过程改善和全员参与的精神,人们已经被误导到这些漂亮的业绩上(过程+参与的结果)而忽视了LEAN&nbsp;的真正意义所在。实在是一种可悲!

LEAN&nbsp;是用来&nbsp;THINKING&nbsp;的!--【匿名用户】:E-works热心网友
8. re: 程晓华物料经理成熟度评估
程老师:
您好,能不能就您设计的问题给一个参考版本。
谢谢--gaochengqiang
9. re: 均衡生产模型-免费共享
学习--张敏
10. re: 十胜十败 - 道德仁义度+ 文谋武治明
曹操欲除袁绍,又恐兵众不敌,郭嘉度主公心思,炮制十胜十败之论.曹操帐下重要谋士之一,对敌手的强弱判断准确.--【匿名用户】:E-works热心网友
11. re: 十胜十败 - 道德仁义度+ 文谋武治明
以铜为镜,正衣冠;以古为镜,知兴替;以人为镜,明得失。
--【匿名用户】:E-works热心网友
12. re: EMS的选择
站在EMS的角度看问题,当然选择第一种。多方面原因:首先EMS信息不对称,可能无法获取客户预测准确率的准确信息;&nbsp;其次,EMS的利润比较薄,承担物料E&O责任对其项目经理和运用指标的压力会很大,按客户Forcast虽然也可能产生一些短期扯皮的困扰,但终获赔偿;&nbsp;最后,客户要求的指标也应该在最初设立的柔性范围下,EMS通常有能力cover承诺的柔性范围,客户预测一旦超出设定柔性,拒绝承诺或交不了货也不是EMS的错。--【匿名用户】:E-works热心网友
13. re: 物料总监的价值
这样算啊,是不是还要加个系数,应该属于整个supply chain的value吧,不然其他人的value如何算,total cost又如何算.~^_^~玩笑话!--【匿名用户】:E-works热心网友
14. re: Chinaiscm-中国集成供应链管理与库存控制论坛邀请函
我把这个问题也COPY到库存控制论坛里面去.--程晓华
15. re: Chinaiscm-中国集成供应链管理与库存控制论坛邀请函
--【匿名用户】:E-works热心网友
16. re: lean itself is a kind of waste - LEAN 本身就是浪费?
太有感触了,很多流程实行lean project后,马上生产车间空间减少了30%, cycle time减少了50%, 成本节约了40%等等, 报告那是相当的漂亮啊,谁的project cost down的最多,谁拿的奖金就越高,我也就纳闷,没有这个lean project时,这些人都干嘛去了呢?--【匿名用户】:Julia
17. re: lean itself is a kind of waste - LEAN 本身就是浪费?
其实这取决于管理者自身,是为了lean而lean,还是真正使用lean的方法得到了改善.--【匿名用户】:E-works热心网友
18. re: Load less (MPS-主生产计划) chase more ? 多追料,少推料?
信息共享是最直接最简单的方式参与客户的市场预测,但客户往往只会针对某些特殊材料供应商/长期合作伙伴采取这种方式.
shortage与MPS总量不是绝对的因果关系吧.--【匿名用户】:E-works热心网友
19. re: VMI如何帮助供应商降低库存?
个人认为一个很关键的因素在于供应商的层次和管理水平不齐。比如像MURATA,系统建全,物流一流,可以最优到SPQ去根据FCST补货。但还有一些大的供应商像YAGEO,WALSIN,方法,系统及CS的局限性使得他们不能很好的管理库存,反倒依靠客户的意见去补货。要想实现一致性,个人认为EMS 应该有一个建全的系统共享给所有的供应商,供应商将物流INTRANSMIT时间设定,自已的备货信息提供,放在客户里的库存可以不用太多,但客户可以清楚了解供应商在自已那边的备货情况,有UPSIDE时,可以清楚了解能PULL IN多少, DOWNSIDE时,可以减少物流成本,供应商可以及时的把多备的库存卖给别的客户。我觉得如果开发一个高效的信息系统可以减少很多人力成本和人为的错误。--【匿名用户】:E-works热心网友
20. re: Load less (MPS-主生产计划) chase more ? 多追料,少推料?
但是如果因为SHORTAGE使得我们对客户的de-commit,从而损失了更多的PPV,怎么办呢?
EMS可不可以在派一部人参与客户的市场预测从而实现信息更好的共享?--【匿名用户】:E-works热心网友

阅读排行榜

评论排行榜

Today’s demand supply chain management is more and more relying on system – IT tools like ERP, EDI, suppliers portals etc. etc., which is good to speed up the information sharing between partners and shorten the cycle time for processes handling.

 

But the thing is always good and bad. Somehow we are too much relying on the IT tools even indulging ourselves with losing ourselves. Something just like when after computer is invented, less and less people are interested in calligraphy – handwritings, which is actually a kind of art of human being.

 

Same things are happening on supply chain management. After MRP is introduced to materials management, we are seeing less and less real planners who knows how to judge the purchase requisitions with their own brains, Today more and more planners are actually doing operators jobs, they do not need to think about, judge anything, they just feed the machines and waiting for the output of machines …

 

We need to get back to some traditional ways like hard copy approval for some critical control points of supply chain management.

 

  1. MPS – master production scheduling

This is something the most important in the total demand supply chain management, which must be approved the site materials director or even by the General managers.

 

The control points of this approval –

-         historical forecast variance was analyzed with a variance trend chart

-         current phases of PLC – product life cycle we are in for different products / models

-         total available capacity (machine / operators etc.) is aligned with MPS loading, which is deciding how much buffer level we should or should not build for products;

-         critical materials supply is analyzed and be prepared to handle those critical parts specially, which maybe a manual process as discussed in Chapter 3.

 

  1. Commitment to customers

This must be seriously and carefully handled – once we commit, we must achieve it with 100%. Sometimes people are too conservative to commit customers, sometimes they over-commit to customers, both are wrong and need to be controlled by managers even directors.

 

  1. PR / actions report for A commodity

Because most of the inventory is coming from these A commodities and usually the delivery flexibility is very bad for those suppliers, which either they do not accept push out / cancellation or there is little room for pull in. If we purely follow up the instructions from MRP for rescheduling these A commodities, we may suffer from either shortage or excess.

 

The control points for this approval is –

-         Materials planners need to check / calculate the rationality for rescheduling information from total demand of monthly and try to avoid rescheduling activities back and forth in different weeks, which is easy to lose our reputation / credibility in suppliers side.

-         Terms for rescheduling and the market supply trend must be double checked before take real actions by buyers;

-         DOS on hand / on order vs rescheduling requests with a macro approach.

 

  1. Urgent shipment request

 

There are many excuses for urgent shipments which caused lots of extra logistics cost, but this is not the key, the most serious issue is behind urgent shipments, there may be many system problems / human mistakes hidden.

 

Many times we find that the so called urgent shipments are caused by wrong lead time maintained in ERP system; sometimes are purely human mistakes.

 

  1. Manual PR / PO

 

Manual PR is outside of MRP running, usually because of –

-         Customer request for risk orders to components suppliers

-         Alternative parts

-         Last buy for EOL models

-         Compensation for human mistakes

 

Our employees are usually very listening to customers because we are EMS and customer is customer, somehow our employees even do not want to follow their bosses’ instruction but just customers … sad to say that but that’s true, especially when the case happened between our low level employees and the low level employees from customers.

 

Risk order is quite risky to us, but sometimes our employee just release the orders to suppliers without approval;

 

Alternative parts are very hateful and very dangerous to handle, they must be approved by managers to help to reduce the mistakes of people;

 

Last buy PO is the most key activity for controlling and reducing the E & O liability for both customers and ours. When release last PO for components, people are either too conservative for cheap parts or too bodacious for more expensive parts. Approval from managers will be helpful to check on. Historical attrition / physical counting variance must be checked.

  1. Manual W/O or production orders

 

This is something quite similar with manual PO for risk orders from customers. As we said, people usually regard customer as everything, and customers can control our production lines what and when / how many to do. This is absolutely wrong and production team can only follow the production schedulers’ instruction for any production activities. Let them go or just escalate when there is any interruptions from whoever is not production planning persons.

 

  1. Adjustment for cycle counting variance

 

This is common sense but not executed very well, where 2 tings need be controlled –

-         Owners for inventory adjustment. Who should be authorized for inventory adjustment when variance is found? Warehouse and Production? NO. Either inventory planning or finance only;

-         Excuses on variance. Usually we need explain why variance is there and usually what we get from the owners of each inventory location is “ because we did not control materials very well …. We have variance” and the actions is “ we will strengthen the control, we will train the people there, we will enhance their duty of sense  …”   all these are bullshit and totally nonsense for digging out real root cause behind and not mention to improve.

 

These 7 areas are the most dangerous areas during daily materials operations and a regular audit like quarterly is needed for these 7 items to check the implementation. Remember that people are never self-controlled unless they are controlled and that’s the reason we still need to have managers / directors, VPs etc. We trust people but it does not mean we believe what people are doing …

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

发表于: 2009-06-01 10:49 程晓华 阅读(505) 评论(4)  收藏(0) 好文推荐

作者该类其他文章:

发表评论
# re: Supply chain approval matrix
2009-06-01 11:15 | Sophie Shi | 1楼
Eyesight is deep. Thank you.
# re: Supply chain approval matrix
2009-06-01 15:27 | 【匿名用户】:Joanna | 2楼
这是否是在考核管理水平?
# re: Supply chain approval matrix
2009-06-01 16:40 | 程晓华 | 3楼
NO, SCM流程控制点。
# re: Supply chain approval matrix
2009-06-01 18:03 | 吴学强 | 4楼
确实,没有ERP等IT系统来辅助管理,肯定是难以提高效率与效益的。然而如果完全依赖IT系统,缺失了发挥人的主观能动性,同样也是不行的,毕竟企业内外部环境时刻在变,而MPS/MRP是依据一些固定的参数进行处理的,比如提前期、生产批量等等都是固定的,所以人的经验与知识水平对于用好MPS/MRP是非常重要的。

标题  
姓名  
主页
内容   
请输入验证码:
*
(如果看不到图片,请多刷新几次页面)
  登录   Top
[使用Ctrl+Enter键可以直接提交]