<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><channel><title>程晓华谈制造业库存控制问题</title><link>http://blog.e-works.net.cn/30154/</link><description>集成供应链管理与库存控制 －方法、流程、软件系统、组织结构设计－3P管理 (People / Process / Performance)</description><managingEditor>程晓华</managingEditor><dc:language>zh-CHS</dc:language><generator>.Text Version 0.958.2004.214</generator><item><dc:creator>【匿名用户】:E-works热心网友</dc:creator><title>re: 均衡生产模型－免费共享</title><link>http://blog.e-works.net.cn/30154/archive/2010/03/20/65319.html#76931</link><pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 09:28:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.e-works.net.cn/30154/archive/2010/03/20/65319.html#76931</guid><description>hao&lt;img src ="http://blog.e-works.net.cn/30154/aggbug/76931.html" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>【匿名用户】:E-works热心网友</dc:creator><title>re: 案例讨论：物料计划员为什么“无端地”被处罚？</title><link>http://blog.e-works.net.cn/30154/archive/2010/02/23/2106.html#75204</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 07:20:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.e-works.net.cn/30154/archive/2010/02/23/2106.html#75204</guid><description>1.首先作为物料计划员的L小姐,在物料短缺的时候应该留守第一线协助解决问题,统计未来物料供应状况,而不是离开。由于程序的问题造成计划用量与实际用量不符,这个问题应该存在一定时间,而L小姐并没有及时发现,这是她的失职,应作出一定处罚。&lt;img src ="http://blog.e-works.net.cn/30154/aggbug/75204.html" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>饼干</dc:creator><title>re: 8岁女孩儿遗言催人泪下：我来过，我很乖</title><link>http://blog.e-works.net.cn/30154/archive/2010/02/22/28216.html#75157</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 13:31:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.e-works.net.cn/30154/archive/2010/02/22/28216.html#75157</guid><description>我喉咙哽咽了，我流泪了，她为什么被抛弃？在第一时间为什么没有得到政府的重视？她一定还有一个没有说出的梦想：想知道亲身父母是谁？我想起了这个国家，我想起了这个国家的治理者，我想起了这个国家的社会保障制度，我想起了在这个有5000年文明的古国每天还在上演同样类似的故事，我想起了还有多少孩子一出生同样被放弃，...&lt;img src ="http://blog.e-works.net.cn/30154/aggbug/75157.html" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>饼干</dc:creator><title>re: 物料管理之难 – 干好了是应该的</title><link>http://blog.e-works.net.cn/30154/archive/2010/02/21/74943.html#75109</link><pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 14:49:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.e-works.net.cn/30154/archive/2010/02/21/74943.html#75109</guid><description>真的是左右为难！但好象永远都是这种协调，妥协，委屈与偶尔骄傲之五味杂陈。&lt;img src ="http://blog.e-works.net.cn/30154/aggbug/75109.html" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>【匿名用户】:E-works热心网友</dc:creator><title>re: 物料管理之难 – 干好了是应该的</title><link>http://blog.e-works.net.cn/30154/archive/2010/02/14/74943.html#74944</link><pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 15:41:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.e-works.net.cn/30154/archive/2010/02/14/74943.html#74944</guid><description>晓华所言极是，已经入世的境界了，呵呵&lt;img src ="http://blog.e-works.net.cn/30154/aggbug/74944.html" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>【匿名用户】:E-works热心网友</dc:creator><title>re: 案例讨论：物料计划员为什么“无端地”被处罚？</title><link>http://blog.e-works.net.cn/30154/archive/2010/01/09/2106.html#72122</link><pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 08:29:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.e-works.net.cn/30154/archive/2010/01/09/2106.html#72122</guid><description>类似于阻容件类的低值品,&amp;amp;nbsp;而且是公司所有产品的通用料,&amp;amp;nbsp;如果不是供应商处有特殊原因,&amp;amp;nbsp;那么在物料计划时早应备有相当余量,&amp;amp;nbsp;绝不应该卡到生产刚够或略有余量&lt;img src ="http://blog.e-works.net.cn/30154/aggbug/72122.html" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>【匿名用户】:Abby</dc:creator><title>re: 库存优化与成本控制 - 程晓华演讲稿</title><link>http://blog.e-works.net.cn/30154/archive/2009/12/25/67068.html#70946</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 03:18:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.e-works.net.cn/30154/archive/2009/12/25/67068.html#70946</guid><description>程先生，我是Abby。感谢您的精彩演讲。希望以后多多合作！Merry&amp;amp;nbsp;Christmas!&lt;img src ="http://blog.e-works.net.cn/30154/aggbug/70946.html" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>【匿名用户】:E-works热心网友</dc:creator><title>re: lean itself is a kind of waste - LEAN 本身就是浪费？</title><link>http://blog.e-works.net.cn/30154/archive/2009/12/17/26934.html#70147</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 03:43:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.e-works.net.cn/30154/archive/2009/12/17/26934.html#70147</guid><description>嘿嘿，我想大家还都没能理解LEAN的真正核心！LEAN讲究的是一种过程改善和全员参与的精神，人们已经被误导到这些漂亮的业绩上（过程+参与的结果）而忽视了LEAN&amp;amp;nbsp;的真正意义所在。实在是一种可悲！LEAN&amp;amp;nbsp;是用来&amp;amp;nbsp;THINKING&amp;amp;nbsp;的！&lt;img src ="http://blog.e-works.net.cn/30154/aggbug/70147.html" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>gaochengqiang</dc:creator><title>re: 程晓华物料经理成熟度评估</title><link>http://blog.e-works.net.cn/30154/archive/2009/11/24/58928.html#67535</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 03:29:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.e-works.net.cn/30154/archive/2009/11/24/58928.html#67535</guid><description>程老师：您好，能不能就您设计的问题给一个参考版本。谢谢&lt;img src ="http://blog.e-works.net.cn/30154/aggbug/67535.html" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>张敏</dc:creator><title>re: 均衡生产模型－免费共享</title><link>http://blog.e-works.net.cn/30154/archive/2009/11/12/65319.html#66492</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 08:27:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.e-works.net.cn/30154/archive/2009/11/12/65319.html#66492</guid><description>学习&lt;img src ="http://blog.e-works.net.cn/30154/aggbug/66492.html" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>【匿名用户】:E-works热心网友</dc:creator><title>re: 十胜十败 － 道德仁义度＋ 文谋武治明</title><link>http://blog.e-works.net.cn/30154/archive/2009/11/10/66002.html#66164</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:14:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.e-works.net.cn/30154/archive/2009/11/10/66002.html#66164</guid><description>曹操欲除袁绍,又恐兵众不敌,郭嘉度主公心思,炮制十胜十败之论.曹操帐下重要谋士之一,对敌手的强弱判断准确.&lt;img src ="http://blog.e-works.net.cn/30154/aggbug/66164.html" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>【匿名用户】:E-works热心网友</dc:creator><title>re: 十胜十败 － 道德仁义度＋ 文谋武治明</title><link>http://blog.e-works.net.cn/30154/archive/2009/11/09/66002.html#66156</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:11:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.e-works.net.cn/30154/archive/2009/11/09/66002.html#66156</guid><description>以铜为镜，正衣冠；以古为镜，知兴替；以人为镜，明得失。&lt;img src ="http://blog.e-works.net.cn/30154/aggbug/66156.html" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>【匿名用户】:E-works热心网友</dc:creator><title>re: EMS的选择</title><link>http://blog.e-works.net.cn/30154/archive/2009/11/08/28681.html#66013</link><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 13:51:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.e-works.net.cn/30154/archive/2009/11/08/28681.html#66013</guid><description>站在EMS的角度看问题，当然选择第一种。多方面原因：首先EMS信息不对称，可能无法获取客户预测准确率的准确信息；&amp;amp;nbsp;其次，EMS的利润比较薄，承担物料E&amp;amp;O责任对其项目经理和运用指标的压力会很大，按客户Forcast虽然也可能产生一些短期扯皮的困扰，但终获赔偿；&amp;amp;nbsp;最后，客户要求的指标也应该在最初设立?...&lt;img src ="http://blog.e-works.net.cn/30154/aggbug/66013.html" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>【匿名用户】:E-works热心网友</dc:creator><title>re: 物料总监的价值</title><link>http://blog.e-works.net.cn/30154/archive/2009/10/07/62366.html#63087</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 04:43:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.e-works.net.cn/30154/archive/2009/10/07/62366.html#63087</guid><description>这样算啊,是不是还要加个系数,应该属于整个supply&amp;nbsp;chain的value吧，不然其他人的value如何算，total&amp;nbsp;cost又如何算．~^_^~玩笑话！&lt;img src ="http://blog.e-works.net.cn/30154/aggbug/63087.html" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>程晓华</dc:creator><title>re: Chinaiscm-中国集成供应链管理与库存控制论坛邀请函</title><link>http://blog.e-works.net.cn/30154/archive/2009/09/21/57040.html#61612</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 03:11:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.e-works.net.cn/30154/archive/2009/09/21/57040.html#61612</guid><description>我把这个问题也COPY到库存控制论坛里面去.&lt;img src ="http://blog.e-works.net.cn/30154/aggbug/61612.html" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>【匿名用户】:E-works热心网友</dc:creator><title>re: Chinaiscm-中国集成供应链管理与库存控制论坛邀请函</title><link>http://blog.e-works.net.cn/30154/archive/2009/09/18/57040.html#61332</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:48:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.e-works.net.cn/30154/archive/2009/09/18/57040.html#61332</guid><description>现在公司MPS&amp;nbsp;loading&amp;nbsp;与supply&amp;nbsp;出现一些问题，寻求解决方式．1.公司为控制库存，从MPS&amp;nbsp;loading开始控制，MPS&amp;nbsp;Performance作为对KPI&amp;nbsp;measure&amp;nbsp;planner&amp;nbsp;.2.blocked&amp;nbsp;4&amp;nbsp;weeks&amp;nbsp;MPS&amp;nbsp;qty&amp;nbsp;为基数，monthly&amp;nbsp;performance&amp;nbsp;:&amp;nbsp;shipped&amp;nbsp;qty&amp;nbsp;...&lt;img src ="http://blog.e-works.net.cn/30154/aggbug/61332.html" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>【匿名用户】:Julia</dc:creator><title>re: lean itself is a kind of waste - LEAN 本身就是浪费？</title><link>http://blog.e-works.net.cn/30154/archive/2009/07/23/26934.html#51620</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 07:36:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.e-works.net.cn/30154/archive/2009/07/23/26934.html#51620</guid><description>太有感触了,很多流程实行lean&amp;nbsp;project后,马上生产车间空间减少了30%,&amp;nbsp;cycle&amp;nbsp;time减少了50%,&amp;nbsp;成本节约了40%等等,&amp;nbsp;报告那是相当的漂亮啊,谁的project&amp;nbsp;cost&amp;nbsp;down的最多,谁拿的奖金就越高,我也就纳闷,没有这个lean&amp;nbsp;project时,这些人都干嘛去了呢?&lt;img src ="http://blog.e-works.net.cn/30154/aggbug/51620.html" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>【匿名用户】:E-works热心网友</dc:creator><title>re: lean itself is a kind of waste - LEAN 本身就是浪费？</title><link>http://blog.e-works.net.cn/30154/archive/2009/06/24/26981.html#46666</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:06:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.e-works.net.cn/30154/archive/2009/06/24/26981.html#46666</guid><description>其实这取决于管理者自身，是为了lean而lean，还是真正使用lean的方法得到了改善．&lt;img src ="http://blog.e-works.net.cn/30154/aggbug/46666.html" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>【匿名用户】:E-works热心网友</dc:creator><title>re: Load less (MPS－主生产计划) chase more ? 多追料，少推料？</title><link>http://blog.e-works.net.cn/30154/archive/2009/06/24/26882.html#46661</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 13:49:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.e-works.net.cn/30154/archive/2009/06/24/26882.html#46661</guid><description>信息共享是最直接最简单的方式参与客户的市场预测,但客户往往只会针对某些特殊材料供应商/长期合作伙伴采取这种方式.shortage与MPS总量不是绝对的因果关系吧．&lt;img src ="http://blog.e-works.net.cn/30154/aggbug/46661.html" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>【匿名用户】:E-works热心网友</dc:creator><title>re: VMI如何帮助供应商降低库存？</title><link>http://blog.e-works.net.cn/30154/archive/2009/06/21/2214.html#46206</link><pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 12:51:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.e-works.net.cn/30154/archive/2009/06/21/2214.html#46206</guid><description>个人认为一个很关键的因素在于供应商的层次和管理水平不齐。比如像MURATA，系统建全，物流一流，可以最优到SPQ去根据FCST补货。但还有一些大的供应商像YAGEO，WALSIN，方法，系统及CS的局限性使得他们不能很好的管理库存，反倒依靠客户的意见去补货。要想实现一致性，个人认为EMS&amp;nbsp;应该有一个建全的系统共享给所有的供?...&lt;img src ="http://blog.e-works.net.cn/30154/aggbug/46206.html" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>